Categories
Agatha Christie-Related Digital Movies & TV International/Foreign-Language Films Movies & Television (Videos) Mystery & Suspense

AGATHA CHRISTIE’S TEN LITTLE INDIANS (1989)

SUMMARY:                   Running Time: 1 Hr., 38 Min.  

Filmed on location in South Africa, this 1989 Cannon Films remake is directed by Alan Birkinshaw.  Agatha Christie’s suspense thriller is now re-imagined taking place in a remote African safari during the mid-1930’s.  Like the original 1945 film adaptation and two subsequent remakes, some character details have been altered while loosely adapting Christie’s classic mystery. 

For instance, the novel’s self-righteous British spinster Emily Brent is now the fussy, middle-aged American actress, Marion Marshall. The names and nationalities of the general and the doctor have also been altered without actually changing their personalities. Hence, the characters from Christie’s novel/stage play are mostly intact, including their alleged crimes. One oddity, as a comparison to other versions, is that this group of ten now inexplicably consists of a composite of Americans, Central Europeans, and the British.

Soon isolated by a native tribe and with their radio disabled, the ten bewildered guests are trapped as human prey for their unseen host: U.N. Owen.  Owen’s predatory reliance on the “Ten Little Indians” nursery rhyme foretells their doom., with the lyrics being noticeably emphasized this time.  Not only is their camp surrounded by dangerous jungle wildlife (i.e. tigers and lions), these captives are subsequently executed one-by-one for ghastly crimes they are accused of committing.  Can anyone evade Owen’s bloodthirsty wrath?    

Judge Wargrave: Donald Pleasance

Marion Marshall: Brenda Vaccaro   

General Romensky: Herbert Lom

Vera Claythorne: Sarah Maur Thorp

Capt. Phillip Lombard / Jack Hutchinson: Frank Stallone

Blore: Warren Berlinger

Dr. Werner: Yehuda Efroni

Elmo Rodgers: Paul L. Smith

Mrs. Rodgers: Moira Lister

Anthony James Marston: Neil McCarthy

U.N. Owen’s Voice: Uncredited

Notes: Producer Harry Alan Towers actually filmed Ten Little Indians” three times: the other instances being 1965 and 1974.  Set in a wintry chalet in the Alps, his 1965 black-and-white “Ten Little Indians” stars Hugh O’Brian & Shirley Eaton.  Using “And Then There Were None” and, in some alternate versions, “Ten Little Indians,” as the title, his 1974 version is set at an abandoned hotel in the Iranian desert, where Herbert Lom portrays the doctor amongst an all-European cast. 

Of interest is how Towers’ increasingly muddled remakes mixes-and-matches with both Christie’s novel and her stage play, the semi-parody 1945 film, and inevitably his own 1965 film’s plot variations and name changes.     

REVIEW:

Any residual shock value dating back to 1945’s And Then There Were None has long since evaporated.  Filmed on the cheap, some authentic scenery delivers this 1989 clunker’s sole asset – a possible second is a ham-fisted effort trying to convey the bone-chilling horror of Christie’s novel (ironically, the film’s credits only reference her sanitized stage play). 

What’s devoid from this somewhat grisly potboiler is any semblance of deductive reasoning by the captives/suspects or even a believable descent into cold fear/paranoia amongst the dwindling survivors. For that matter, why exactly the killer chose these specific targets is ignored. Case in point: when this U.N. Owen’s captives all too thinly reveal their past sins, no one bothers to question their accounts – worse yet, Lombard’s backstory once again isn’t even provided.

Additional missteps in basic logic effectively sabotage this film (i.e. Why do the supposedly human-hungry lions and tigers briefly seen early in the film evidently vanish?  Given the limited technology of the 1930’s, how could this U.N. Owen have researched all these old crimes in different countries? Aside from Christie’s convenient ‘twists’ aiding the culprit, the film’s variations bungle them in such ways where it’s likely impossible to commit at least one of the murders.).  Such unforced gaffes subsequently ground Christie’s iconic whodunnit into pulpy cinematic sludge.   

As for the cast’s performances, it’s a mixed bag.  Hollywood veterans Pleasence, Berlinger, Lom, and, to a degree, the young Maur Thorp (resembling Elizabeth Perkins) are watchable – give them some credit for trying.  Of them, Lom reliably makes the most of his limited screen time while Pleasence knows how to play subtle creepiness. Of minimal help to them is George S. Clinton’s passable musical score that lends some sense of a period piece mystery the film sought to be.  

As for the other castmates: Stallone, Vaccaro, Efroni, Lister (eerily resembling Gilligan Island’s Mrs. Howell, no less), McCarthy, and Smith’s clichéd aura of menace all hover between underwhelming to eye-rolling, amateur hour-caliber performances.  Usually an extra in his older brother’s movies, Stallone is dubiously cast as a romantic stock hero in the mold of Allan Quatermain.  Yet, his bland macho presence still surpasses veteran character actress Vacarro, who disappoints in a paycheck-only effort.        

Watching this theatrical flop is really about the curiosity factor, if anything.  The question is: how much patience should Christie’s fans muster?  Enduring this dreck once is plenty, but its potential (i.e. the safari novelty) for a better film is sporadically visible.  Otherwise, this Ten Little Indians is convincing proof of Hollywood’s law of diminishing returns — too many remakes inevitably erode masterpieces into formulaic schlock. 

Note: For a suspenseful “Ten Little Indians”-type safari, try 1996’s “The Ghost and The Darkness,” starring Val Kilmer & Michael Douglas.

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 2 Stars

NO IMAGE AVAILABLE


Categories
Agatha Christie-Related Digital Movies & TV Movies & Television (Videos) Mystery & Suspense

TEN LITTLE INDIANS (aka AGATHA CHRISTIE’S TEN LITTLE INDIANS) (1965)

SUMMARY:       Running Time: 1 Hr., 29 Min. (Black & White)

Directed by George Pollock, this retitled 1965 remake (of 1945’s And Then There Were None) shifts Agatha Christie’s secluded Indian Island to a wintry mountain chalet, presumably in the Austrian Alps.  As the prior film did, some character names, nationalities, and/or their crimes are altered in a loose adaptation of Agatha Christie’s stage play of her own classic novel. 

For instance, secretary Vera Claythorne is now ‘Ann Clyde,’ while condescending middle-aged British spinster Emily Brent is replaced by a glamorous German movie star.  Obnoxiously stupid British playboy Anthony Marston (in the 1945 film, he is a boozy, free-loading Russian expatriate) is now Fabian’s obnoxious American crooner ‘Mike Raven.’  Likewise, the names of the judge and the servant couple have been modified to better suit the actors.  

Transported by train, sleigh ride, and then gondola, eight strangers attend a weekend house party—isolating them at least fifteen miles from the nearest village.  Left to entertain themselves, the guests and the married servant couple are mortified by accusations of ghastly crimes from the ominously recorded voice of their absent host, ‘U.N. Owen.’ 

Adhering to revised lyrics of the “Ten Little Indians” nursery rhyme (a copy of which appears in each guest’s room), the ten captives are subsequently murdered, one by one.  Alliances will be made, but will anyone evade a predator’s vengeful wrath?    

Hugh Lombard: Hugh O’Brian

Ann Clyde: Shirley Eaton   

William Henry Blore: Stanley Holloway

Dr. Edward Armstrong: Dennis Price

Ilona Bergen: Daliah Lavi

Judge Arthur Cannon: Wilfrid Hyde-White

Herr Grohmann: Mario Adorf

General John Mandrake: Leo Genn

Frau Grohmann: Marianne Hoppe

Narrator: Bill Mitchell

U.N. Owen’s Voice: Christopher Lee (uncredited)

Note: One of the film’s producers, Harry Alan Towers, remade this same movie twice more — once in 1974 (reverting to the British title of “And Then Were There None”), with an ‘all-star’ European cast in an Iranian desert locale.  The last Towers remake is a cut-rate 1989 rehash set amidst a 1930’s South African safari.  The 1989 title is switched back to “Agatha Christie’s Ten Little Indians.”  Of interest is how these increasingly muddled remakes insist on mixing-and-matching Christie’s source material, the 1945 film, and this 1965 film’s own plot variations and name changes.     

REVIEW:

Viewing this remake, either in comparison to its classy 1945 predecessor, or strictly on its own merits, the result is still the same.  Unlike And Then There Were None’s droll black comedy charm, 1965’s incarnation blandly rolls through its motions geared for a different generation that is more attuned to Sean Connery’s James Bond films. 

Replacing the original film’s witty banter, sensuality (i.e. implied sex) and gritty violence (i.e. a destroyed cable car; a lengthy fistfight) are weakly substituted in, if only for sensationalism’s sake.  Further, this cast’s wooden chemistry doesn’t help – for instance, Blore, the general, the judge, and the doctor blend far too much together as the older British guests.  As Dr. Armstrong, Dennis Price, in particular, is guilty of an apathetic, reading-off-the-script performance.  

Stanley Holloway and Wilfrid Hyde-White gradually assert themselves as Blore and the judge, as their work becomes the film’s best asset.  The same doesn’t apply to romantic co-leads Hugh O’Brian and Shirley Eaton.  While Goldfinger’s Eaton has a likable screen presence, her one-dimensional ‘Ann Clyde’ is merely a blonde damsel-in-distress.  O’Brian’s macho engineer shares hardly any resemblance with Christie’s scoundrel, Phillip Lombard, short of the same last name.  

Another stale re-imagining is Fabian’s mercifully brief role.  Overplaying the smug ‘Mike Raven,’ Fabian appears out of his acting league.  Case in point: he delivers one the most amateurish-looking death scenes in movie history.  Dalilah Lavi’s effort is marginally better, but her conceited ‘Ilona Bergen’ is an unnecessary (and far younger) substitute for the morally shrewish Emily Brent. 

As the ill-tempered servant couple, Marianne Hoppe and Mario Adorf are the most compelling, largely because they are the only ones conveying a believable sense of panic.  Portraying the volatile ‘Grohmann,’ Adorf at least brings a new variant to Christie’s storyline.  

Note: Curiously, despite playing the butler, Adorf resembles the novel’s physical description of Blore. Had Adorf switched roles with the affable Holloway (and instead making it a Lombard/Blore fistfight), that might have inspired a welcome boost to the script.      

The unremarkable changes re: the killer’s methods can be shrugged off … that is, with a notable exception.  One death pits the syringe-packing killer slowly closing in on another hapless victim – who doesn’t bother screaming or even make a token effort of resistance (supposedly, this wide-awake character is just too terrified).  No matter how the director rationalized it, this sequence is a ludicrous Hollywood ‘homicide.’  Another element that sabotages suspense is composer-conductor Malcolm Lockyer’s inability to shift his misguided jazzy score into something appropriately menacing.    

A final straw is the goofy ‘whodunnit?’ interactive time-out at the climax where an unseen narrator implores viewers to guess the culprit.  Let’s dismiss this ridiculous intrusion as a best-forgotten 1960’s Hollywood gimmick.  Despite its surplus of weaknesses, this take on Ten Little Indians still isn’t half-bad by comparison. 

Think of this way: between Towers’ three remakes (1965, 1974, and 1989), sliding into mediocrity becomes inevitable.  It’s really the fallacy of excessive recycling.  By that reckoning, 1965’s Ten Little Indians ranking second-best to the original film is a back-handed compliment.             

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 6 Stars

IMAGE NOT AVAILABLE

Categories
Digital Movies & TV Movies & Television (Videos) STAR TREK-Related

STAR TREK V: THE FINAL FRONTIER

SUMMARY:                               RUNNING TIME: Approx. 105 Min.

This 1989 sequel is directed (and co-written) by William Shatner. Set shortly after Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, the new U.S.S. Enterprise-A’s shakedown cruise has been a dismal failure.  Forced to cope with the ship’s various malfunctions (including a disabled transporter), Captain Kirk’s short-handed crew is sent on a covert deep space mission to the remote planet, Nimbus III, to rescue three abducted diplomats, including one Klingon and one Romulan. 

An enigmatic Vulcan renegade named Sybok and his brainwashed cult hijack the Enterprise for a vision quest to the center of the universe seeking out ‘God,’ or whom he calls ‘Sha Kaa Ree.’ Meanwhile, a Klingon warship is in hot pursuit, as its commander seeks high-profile glory taking down the despised Kirk.    

Captain James T. Kirk: William Shatner

Captain Spock: Leonard Nimoy   

Dr. Leonard ‘Bones’ McCoy: DeForest Kelley

Sybok: Laurence Luckinbill

Commander Hikaru Sulu: George Takei

Sarek (voice cameo): Mark Lenard

Commander Nyota Uhura: Nichelle Nichols

Commander Pavel Chekov: Walter Koenig

Captain Montgomery ‘Scotty’ Scott: James Doohan

St. John Talbot: David Warner

General Korrd: Charles Cooper  

Captain Klaa: Todd Bryant

Vixis: Spice Williams-Crosby

Caitlin Dar: Cynthia Gouw

‘God’ (voice): George Murdoch

David McCoy: Bill Quinn        

Starfleet Admiral: Harve Bennett

REVIEW:

The underwhelming Enterprise-A is an ironically apt metaphor for this cinematic misfire, as nothing quite works right. Foregoing Industrial Light & Magic’s expertise, the film’s much-maligned special effects will impress no one. Despite its sizable budget, Final Frontier is easily the cheapest-looking Trek film ever made.

Still, William Shatner deserves some credit for energizing his big-screen directorial debut with action-adventure, old-school Trek banter, and fresh outdoor locales – not to mention, Hiroshima’s briefly-heard jazz fusion gem entitled “The Moon’s a Window to Heaven.”  Such assets keep in mind that Shatner and Treks II-V producer Harve Bennett had more than three years and at least a $25-33 million budgetary playpen to conjure up something good after The Voyage Home

Structured more like an Original Series TV episode, the sole pivotal moments stem from painful glimpses into Spock and McCoy’s private lives.  DeForest Kelley, in the film’s best scene, pulls off McCoy’s heartbreaking secret with class. As for Leonard Nimoy, it’s disappointing (yet hardly surprising) that he merely phones it in – bringing to mind Harrison Ford’s apathetic take on Han Solo in Return of the Jedi.  Clearly, Nimoy’s quality control efforts in directing/producing Treks III, IV, and VI is an element that Final Frontier sorely lacks. The same applies to the absence of classy director-screenwriter Nicholas Meyer. 

That’s where Final Frontier’s biggest gaffe falls upon Shatner for peddling such a misguided storyline. Desperately trying to streamline Shatner’s visionary ambitions, the dubious compromises Bennett and Paramount made with Shatner result in a horribly clunky script (i.e. awkward bits of comic relief and plenty of bad science – i.e. ‘The Great Barrier’ ). Hence, the storyline’s composite of thematic retreads constitutes a fatal dose of unnecessary déjà vu.     

Note: Case in point: all first six Trek films insist upon showing the Enterprise departing Earth at some point – couldn’t Shatner & Bennett have bothered to change things up and actually move the crew’s shore leave to another planet?  It wouldn’t have been hard for Paramount’s special effects team to digitally alter Yosemite National Park’s sky to some other color, throw in some weird-looking fake plants, and call it a different world.  Just a thought … 

Nearly everything is weakly recycled – i.e. composer Jerry Goldsmith lifts his own work from 1979’s Star Trek: The Motion Picture and Star Trek: The Next Generation to makeshift Final Frontier’s main theme.  Trekkers will have seen most other gimmicks of Final Frontier before, too: a broken-down Enterprise; Kirk’s ship hijacked for the umpteenth time; Kirk, Spock, and McCoy setting aside personal squabbles to save the day; and, from any worn-out dramatic playbook, even the long-lost brother cliché. 

Imagine this: the lackluster Final Frontier is a watered-down compromise from what Shatner first sought, according to his memoir, Star Trek: Movie Memories.  His initial aim was supposedly mocking corrupted televangelism, which somehow meant incorporating a Kirk-escapes-Hell-like climax after the Enterprise crew searches for God.  Unsurprisingly, Paramount Pictures nixed Shatner’s most bizarre twists for Final Frontier from being filmed.    

Shatner’s memoir also alludes to Gene Roddenberry’s controversial (and unproduced) Trek script, The God Thing, that Paramount had earlier vetoed in the mid-seventies.  Shatner’s far tamer Final Frontier tries treading similar religious turf, but the generally negative reaction from fans and critics speaks for itself.  Despite some warm sentiments, the movie’s biggest cop-out (re: God’s true location) only reiterates Final Frontier’s cliché-fest. 

If the film’s reluctant Federation/Klingon/Romulan alliance had been cleverly re-configured, Final Frontier might have been an ideal prelude to 1991’s far darker Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.  Instead, its faulty basic premise: Captain Kirk confronts ‘God’ with the question: “What does ‘God’ need with a starship?” starts fizzling out right after the main credits.  

Final Frontier isn’t an unrepentant cure for insomnia like The Motion Picture, but, given what little this movie offers viewers, it’s no loss that Paramount won’t pursue a possible ‘Director’s Cut.’      

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 3½ Stars

IMAGE NOT AVAILABLE

Categories
Digital Movies & TV Movies & Television (Videos) STAR TREK-Related

STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE

SUMMARY:         RUNNING TIME: Approx. 132 Min.

Directed by Robert Wise, this $40-million 1979 production essentially launched the concept of rebooting old TV shows as big-budget films. 

Set approximately three years after the Original Series ended, a newly-refitted U.S.S. Enterprise is the Federation’s only hope of intercepting an ominous cosmic cloud headed towards Earth.  Supported by his familiar bridge crew, Admiral James T. Kirk resumes command to lead them in a fateful encounter with the machine-like entity dubbing itself as ‘V’Ger.’ 

Admiral James T. Kirk: William Shatner

Spock: Leonard Nimoy   

Dr. Leonard ‘Bones’ McCoy: DeForest Kelley

Lt. Ilia: Persis Khambatta

Lt. Commander Hikaru Sulu: George Takei

Klingon Commander: Mark Lenard

Lt. Commander Nyota Uhura: Nichelle Nichols

Lt. Pavel Chekov: Walter Koenig

Commander Montgomery ‘Scotty’ Scott: James Doohan

Dr. Christine Chapel: Majel Barrett

Captain Willard Decker: Stephen Collins

Lt. Janice Rand: Grace Lee Whitney   

REVIEW:

Forty-plus years doesn’t generate fresh nostalgia for Star Trek’s first movie.  Still, one should keep this much in mind: Motion Picture (TMP) endured a convoluted history. First, it was meant as a low-budget, big-screen revival; then, its aborted Phase II incarnation was supposed to launch a high-profile sequel TV series (minus Nimoy and possibly Shatner’s eventual dismissal); and, finally, a let’s-break-the-bank mega-movie to cash in on Star Wars-mania.  Ultimately, hapless viewers are left with what amounts to ‘Star Trek: The Slow-Motion Picture.’ 

While big-league special effects vastly upgraded the Enterprise, the misguided filmmakers (franchise creator Gene Roddenberry, chief among them) couldn’t/wouldn’t grasp that their monotonous epic isn’t Trek-style entertainment.  Offering grandiose platitudes, like “the human adventure is just beginning,” don’t cut it as a creative substitute for making this movie any more watchable or any less motionless. 

Setting Robert Wise’s classiness aside, his dramatic sensibilities totally mismatch with Trek.  Contributing factors further include the total absence of action-adventure; the film’s ultra-sterilized look (i.e. the drab gray pajama-like Starfleet uniforms); and, undeniably, the cast’s taking themselves-far-too-seriously performances.  Case in point: clearly looking a decade older, Kirk, Spock, and McCoy come off as dead-serious; their endearing TV charisma is nowhere in sight. 

While Roddenberry doesn’t rip off the pulpy glamor of Star Wars, what still doesn’t make sense is why he utterly disregarded the appeal of The Original Series as is. Still, the biggest self-inflicted mistake is Roddenberry’s stubborn insistence that the film’s recycled script forcibly mind-meld the premise of a forgettable Original Series episode, “The Changeling,” with 2001: A Space Odyssey

Hence, the ultra-pretentious TMP saps all the colorful energy powering The Original Series.  As this space opera drags on (with Kirk and Co.’s vague observations of V’Ger spelled out ad nauseam), hope fades that Shatner & Nimoy might still salvage this tone-deaf disaster.

If given the choice, watching 1984’s gloriously stupid The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai would be preferable.  Banzai is clearly sci-fi pulp farce, but, at least, that quirky cult favorite doesn’t strive to bore its viewers.  TMP’s elitist storytelling, by comparison, blurs into a cinematic sleeping pill — it’s just not nearly as fast-acting as Spock’s Vulcan nerve pinch.

P.S. Here’s this reviewer’s quick take re: which inept Trek movie is a better viewing bet – Star Trek V: The Final Frontier or TMP? The edge goes to Final Frontier – William Shatner’s 1989 directorial misfire at least tries to recapture the adventurous spirit of The Original Series.

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 3 Stars

IMAGE NOT AVAILABLE

Categories
Digital Movies & TV Movies & Television (Videos) Online Videos

HOPSCOTCH

SUMMARY:                   Running Time: 1 Hour, 44 Min.

With author Brian Garfield loosely co-adapting his same-titled 1975 novel, this R-rated 1980 comedy directed by Ronald Neame mocks Cold War intrigue.  Unexpectedly demoted to a desk job for insubordination, sixty-ish CIA field ace Miles Kendig (Matthau) absconds to Austria and quietly reunites with his ex-colleague, Isobel (Jackson). 

Inspired by a chance comment by his friendly KGB rival, Yaskov (Lom), Kendig retaliates against his blowhard ex-boss, Myerson (Beatty), from afar by writing an explosive tell-all memoir.  Mailed a sample first chapter, Myerson desperately realizes that Kendig intends to expose his long history of ruthless slimeball tactics (otherwise referred to as “dirty tricks”).  

Kendig’s insightful protégé, Joe Cutter (Waterston), reluctantly follows Myerson’s orders to chase his old friend down.  Meanwhile, with Isobel’s loving help, Kendig cunningly plays an international cat-and-mouse game, with the CIA, FBI, and the KGB, all in hot pursuit.

Changing up the rules of the revenge game, as he goes, proves a fun (not to mention, expensive) way for Kendig to spend his forced retirement. Deliciously baiting his ex-boss with one humiliation after another, Kendig’s risk-taking means finding out if publishing this exposé ultimately signs his death warrant.    

Note: The movie’s title (as with the novel) is the same as Kendig’s memoir.

Miles Kendig: Walter Matthau

Myerson: Ned Beatty   

Isobel Von Schoenberg: Glenda Jackson

Joe Cutter: Sam Waterston

Yaskov: Herbert Lom

Leonard Ross: David Matthau

Parker Westlake: George Baker

Carla: Lucy Saroyan

Maddox: Severn Darden

Follett: Douglas Dirkson

REVIEW:

Aside from its generous slew of profanities (i.e. Myerson’s multiple F-bombs), this intelligent spy-caper comedy for grown-ups delivers vintage Walter Matthau.  Enjoying sly chemistry with the ensemble cast, Matthau’s everyman charm conveys Kendig’s personal vendetta against his bureaucratic nemesis.  Making it look easy, Glenda Jackson, Herbert Lom, and Sam Waterston pitch in, as necessary, to help carry various scenes. 

As the buffoonish Myerson, Ned Beatty’s expletive-laced meltdowns are hilarious (especially, in the Savannah shootout sequence), making him a perfect foil for Matthau’s witty hijinks.  Matthau’s own son, David, and Douglas Dirkson are terrific as Myerson’s mustachioed operatives helping Cutter pursue Kendig.  Matthau’s step-daughter, Lucy Saroyan, cameos as a breezy freelance pilot, as she shares a fun in-joke late in the film.       

Perhaps the most welcome element is how this cast, in a mix of locales worthy of a James Bond film, plausibly imbue their characters as ordinary people in the spy business.  The only letdown stems from the movie’s choice not to divulge Myerson’s ultimate fate (who knows? – maybe he gets promoted, just for irony’s sake).  Leaving it to the audience’s imagination is too much of a cop-out, much like how the script teases Myerson’s sleazy misdeeds without actually divulging specifics. 

Aside from this quibble, the spy game satire of Hopscotch is first-class entertainment.  If one is looking for an underrated comedy gem (complete with a finely-tuned, Mozart-heavy classical music score), then Matthau’s Hopscotch makes perfect sense.    

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 8½ Stars

Note: Pairing this movie with Grumpy Old Men or IQ (with an older Matthau in peak comedic form) makes good sense.  Considering the Herbert Lom connection, Hopscotch is also an ideal double-feature option with Inspector Clouseau’s best capers, i.e. A Shot in the Dark or The Pink Panther Strikes Again

IMAGE NOT AVAILABLE

Categories
Decorations STAR WARS-Related

STAR WARS: RETURN OF THE JEDI WALL HANGING

SUMMARY:

Produced by Artissmo Sports & Entertainment in 2016, it’s a shiny 8” x 10” painted canvas wall decoration.  The canvas is stapled to a solid wood frame.  There is an advisory sticker referencing that this product contains ‘MDF’ (medium-density fibreboard).       

REVIEW:

It appears solidly constructed, including faithful likenesses of the actors.  Due to its canvas texture, however, a light source’s reflection will make the portrait look like it is tightly covered in shrink-wrap.   

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 7 Stars

Categories
Christmas Decorations Movies & Television (Videos)

SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN CHRISTMAS ORNAMENT

SUMMARY:

This approximately 5-inch (including the support base) x 2-inch Christmas ornament depicts Col. Steve Austin in a bionic jogging pose.  It was released in 2015 by Hallmark Marketing Company, LLC, in conjunction with Universal Studios.

REVIEW:

Despite a generic likeness of actor Lee Majors, think of this ornament as a nostalgic salute to Col. Steve Austin in his iconic red track suit.  This sturdily built ornament is firmly attached to a well-designed plastic support base.  This base also works well as a lightweight decoration for desks and shelves. 

Its one detriment is a flimsy hanging wire, which may require replacement by one better-suited for the ornament’s weight.  For the Christmas tree, ornament novelty collections, and/or Six Million Dollar Man fans, this homage to TV’s original bionic super-hero makes a fun nostalgia gift.   

Note: The green pipe-cleaner wire seen below is a homemade replacement. 

BONUS FEATURES:

By pressing a button on the left side of the support base, a voice chip plays a 43-second rendition of the TV series’ opening credits intro (including its sound effects and the voice of actor Richard Anderson as OSI boss Oscar Goldman).  Its battery is accessible through a screwed-in plate beneath the base.

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 8 Stars

Categories
Christmas DC-Related Decorations Movies & Television (Videos)

LYNDA CARTER AS WONDER WOMAN CHRISTMAS ORNAMENT

SUMMARY:

Decorated with a tied gold ribbon as its hanger, this approximately 5-inch (including the support base) x 2½-inch Christmas ornament stars actress Lynda Carter in a familiar ready-for-action pose as TV’s legendary Wonder Woman.  It was released in 2015 by Hallmark Marketing Company, LLC, in conjunction with DC Comics.  Presumably, this decoration is meant to celebrate the TV series’ 40th Anniversary.

REVIEW:

Carter’s distinctive likeness as Wonder Woman is captured near-perfectly by this Hallmark creation.  It is sturdily built and firmly attached to a well-designed plastic support base.  This base also works well as a lightweight decoration for desks and shelves. 

For the Christmas tree, ornament novelty collections, and/or nostalgic Wonder Woman fans, this high-caliber homage to Lynda Carter’s TV super-hero makes a fun holiday gift.

BONUS FEATURES:

By pressing a button on the left side of the support base, a voice chip briefly plays a faithful 28-second rendition of the Wonder Woman TV series theme song.  Its battery is accessible through a screwed-in plate beneath the base.

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 9 Stars

Categories
Decorations

DALMATIAN IN FIRE HAT SNOW GLOBE

SUMMARY:

This small snow globe features a Dalmatian puppy in a fire hat.  Its manufacturer isn’t identified.   

REVIEW:

It’s well-constructed for what it is, including a nicely-decorated base.  Considering its relatively compact size, this globe would make an ideal bookcase decoration. 

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 8 Stars

Categories
Comic Books & Graphic Novels Marvel Comics MARVEL's Hardcovers & Paperbacks

EXCALIBUR {2004-2005 Series}, VOLUME 1: FORGING THE SWORD (MARVEL Comics)

Written by Chris Claremont 

Art by Aaron Lopresti; Greg Adams; Andrew Pepoy; Liquid! Graphics;

& Tom Orzechowski

Cover Art by Andy Park

SUMMARY:

Rebooting its X-Men spin-off franchise, Excalibur, in name only, Marvel Comics published this short-lived series (fourteen issues total) from 2004-2005.  Released in 2004, Forging the Sword is a 96-page reprint of Issues # 1-4 published earlier that year. 

In the immediate aftermath of Genosha’s devastation by a Mega-Sentinel, Professor Charles Xavier has reached the quarantined island nation to search for survivors.  Aided by Eric/Magneto and the ‘ghost’ of Moira MacTaggart, Xavier recruits young mutants Wicked and Freakshow, along with the Morlocks’ Callisto.  Opposing them is a defiant Unus the Untouchable and his own young faction of survivors.  

Seeking to recover two mysterious coffins from Genosha, the tyrannical Magistrates are willing to terminate any mutant resistance.  Caught in the middle, Xavier & Eric reach out to find whoever is in held captive in the coffins.    

Note: The remaining ten issues are collected in two additional volumes released in 2005.  

REVIEW:

Consider it a noble yet failed X-periment.  Curiously, did Marvel assign Chris Claremont this umpteenth X-Men spin-off, or was Claremont pursuing his own tangent, with the company’s blessing?  Either way, Forging the Sword would have sufficed as a four-issue mini-series vs. a tired Xavier-and-Magneto-doing-humanitarian-relief ongoing monthly.    

In terms of the visuals, this art squad generally does excellent work – few panels fail to maintain consistency.  The same compliment applies to cover artist Andy Park.  Yet, it’s a mixed bag as to famed X-Men writer Chris Claremont’s faintly optimistic vision for this new series. 

Case in point: is the metaphorical title “Forging the Sword” deceptive?  In terms of franchise name recognition, then it’s a bait-and-switch.  Captain Britain’s X-group is nowhere near Xavier & Magneto co-mentoring an inexperienced band of raw recruits.   Even so, Claremont’s scripting sufficiently introduces some new faces, but it’s unsurprising that none of them have reached mainstream X-Men fame fifteen plus years later. 

Aside from the book’s minimal length, the peripheral nature of “Forging the Sword” struggles to keep even faithful X-readers motivated.  Sporting only a single dubious gag (pardon the expression — i.e. Freakshow vomiting up Unus after swallowing him) and lots of grim inferences about Genosha’s ruins, there isn’t enough storytelling fabric being woven here. 

For hardcore advocates of Xavier & Magneto’s friendship, then “Forging the Sword” could be construed as a minor revelation.  Otherwise, this book is a forgettable one-and-done for most readers.  Keeping this book would be more about the well-crafted artwork than its limited-appeal storyline.   

ADDITIONAL CONTENT:

The four covers appear as full-page reprints. 

BRIAN’S ODD MOON RATING: 5 Stars